ANcfL,MN]pځW$v~uVOt$6_}3^gZ+>TSOa.أU}G t`>x1}i * cAA?:l$M;^T@iע!"X"|R%$.BKBPUIX5Ud+$py$+5#_#pe.AuLS{V/U7:?ØOʆ P.B̌KX4}(=ѡD%,])fpX ǰ1k_ 9yJ܎c)6-xkM0O@`XE<Y B#n;,юD;٬gwuVIޫr39+ @- n9aG*^Fاb.ZZO ɨJ #h@fpZc;-Yl|Mj鱨XJVS/ QIAV ՀV]RBXT2\WZ} /1w?*HַNz\I@aeij/>itional terminology. Inspite of this, such models satisfy quite good domain theoretic properties. They are proved to be * sequentially complete (a weakened form of omega-completeness), * ``naturally'' continuous (with respect to existing directed ``pointwise'', or ``natural'' lubs), * ``natural'' omega-algebraic, and * ``naturally'' bounded complete These are appropriate generalisation of the ordinary notions of domain theory to the case of non-dcpos (generalised non-dcpo Scott domains and, in fact, are Ershov's general fo-spaces approached here via ``natural'' non-dcpo domains. $%%%%