Louise Dennis: Teaching Portfolio

SET/SEM Summary

Scores after 2005 added since this page was made available

Mean scores for SET/SEM questionnaires. 1 = strongly agree, 5=strongly disagree.

Questions 2003 (G51MC2) 2004 (G51SWT) 2005 (G51MC2)
The teacher was an able communicator 3.0 1.9 1.7
The teacher retained my interest 3.9 2.7 2.65
The teacher was approachable 2.9 2.1 1.74
Sessions were paced appropriately 3.0 2.1 1.83
Overall, this teacher assisted my learning 3.5 2.1 1.91
ACT010: The exercises helped me to understand the lecture material 2.6 1.9 2
ACT035: Practical sessions were structured to provide good learning 2.3 2.2 2.37
GEN034: The teacher was approachable to answer questions 2.6 2.1 1.91
GEN042: I have been encouraged to take responsibility for my own learning 1.9 2.0 1.96
GEN052: I have gained a good understanding of the field 3.0 2.4 2.17
GEN075: The teacher presented the subject materials in an interesting way 3.9 2.8 2.74
GEN087: The teacher's explanations were clear 3.6 2.2 2.13
GEN101: The teacher gave adequate feedback on my work 3.1 2.2 2.48
LAB006: The laboratory sessions aided my understanding 2.3 2.4 2.2
MAT002: The recommended reading was available in the libraries 2.7 2.9 2.5
MAT005: The handouts helped me to understand the material 2.8 2.0 1.95
MAT007: The teacher made good use of audiovisual materials 3.4 2.5 2.5
GEN025: The teacher is punctual 1.5 1.4 1.26
GEN033: There were enough opportunities to ask questions 2.8 2.4 2.22
GEN035: The teacher communicated his/her enthusiasm for the subject 3.2 2.2 2.09
GEN037: The teacher organized classes well 3.0 2.0 1.74
GEN047: The teacher encourages student feedback 2.7 2.4 2.52
GEN066: The teacher provides information which is not in the textbooks 3.2 2.6 2.5
GEN103: The lecture material was well structured 3.0 2.2 1.78

2002

Unfortunately the SET/SEM summary scores for 2002 have been mislaid.